Warren Commission | Media Library | Articles | FAQ | Links | Feedback | Contact | About |
The John F. Kennedy Assassination Homepage |
Navigation
Volumes
|
(Testimony of Dr. Charles James Carrico)Dr. CARRICO. The entrance. All we knew this was a small wound here. Dr. CARRICO. Yes, sir; just where the tie-- Dr. CARRICO. To the right. Dr. CARRICO. Yes. And this wound was fairly round, had no jagged edges, no evidence of powder burns, and so forth. Dr. CARRICO. So far as I know. Dr. CARRICO. Yes. Dr. CARRICO. I believe so. Dr. CARRICO. Yes, an even round wound. Dr. CARRICO. That is right. Dr. CARRICO. I think very likely he would have. Dr. CARRICO. No, sir; we did not. Not having completely evaluated all the wounds, traced out the course of the bullets, this wound would have been compatible with either entrance or exit wound depending upon the size, the velocity, the tissue structure and so forth. First of all, assume that the President was struck by a 6.5 mm. copper-jacketed bullet from a rifle having a muzzle velocity of approximately 2,000 feet per second at a time when the President was approximately 160 to 250 feet from the weapon, with the President being struck from the rear at a downward angle of approximately 45 degrees, being struck on the upper right posterior thorax just above the upper border of the scapula 14 centimeters from the tip of the right acromion process and 14 centimeters below the tip of the right mastoid process. Assume further that the missile passed through the body of the President striking no bones, traversing the neck and sliding between the large muscles in, the posterior aspect of the President's body through a fascia channel without violating the pleural cavity, but bruising only the apex of the right pleural cavity and bruising the most apical portion of the right lung, then causing a hematoma to the right of the larynx which you have described, and creating a jagged wound in the trachea, then exiting precisely at the point where you observe the puncture wound to exist. Now based on those facts was the appearance of the wound in consistent with being an exit wound? Dr. CARRICO. It certainly was. It could have been under the circumstances, Dr. CARRICO. With those facts and the fact as I understand it, no other bullet was found this would be, this was, I believe, was an exit wound. Dr. CARRICO. No, sir. Dr. CARRICO. No, sir; it was not.
|
Found a Typo?Click here |
Copyright by www.jfk-assassination.com | Last Update: Wed, 3 Aug 2016 21:56:34 CET |