While I respect Mr. Balla's opinion and agree that in that time, we all thought the Commission was chaired by honorable men, much information has come to light since that refutes that assertion.

Firstly, Congress itself in it's 1979 report, states that the assassination was the result of a probable conspiracy. Were these not honorable men (and women) also? Their reason for coming to this conclusion was not just the controversial police dictabelt recordings but many other statements from eye and ear witnesses.

Secondly, Gerald Ford's book Write It When I'm Gone states that critical information from the CIA was withheld from the Warren Commission. His publisher believes emphatically that the assassination was indeed the result of a conspiracy. If Ford thought all this was on the up and up I doubt he would have insisted this book be published after his death.

Thirdly, these "honorable" men both in the executive, legislative, and in high military positions brought us closer to the brink of nuclear war with their decisions after the death of JFK than we were before. JFK managed to defuse the brink of war with the Soviets by hard line diplomacy and a hell of alot of luck.

The wreckless foreign policies of Johnson and Nixon were the undoing of both of these men, neither of whom I feel was honorable.

Just look at the newly released Nixon tapes. This man and his administration were "at war" with their own country! Everyone was the enemy in their mind, everyone who didn't agree with them.

In sworn testimony after the death of LBJ, Billy Sol Estes stated that LBJ was responsible for the deaths of 9 people in Texas including JFK and LBJ's own sister Josepha.

My impression (for what it is worth) is that President Johnson feared that a real investigation would suggest that the assasination of President Kennedy would indicsate that the Soviets were responsible for his death and this could potentially lead to war with them and therefore millions of deaths.

I think most would agree that one mans' murder simply wasn't worth that kind of confrontation and Johnson put the government quickly on a path to deflect the truth and make somebody appear to be a lone nut assasin and steer the publics attention away from the Soviets..

Think about it, the men who made up the Watrren Commission were honorable men and would never have participated in a conspiracy, they were simply trying to avoid World War Three and their actions were justified.

Once you accept this as reality, the details seem to fit together rather well, the Warren Commission's findings are gibberish but understandable when you realize what their goal really was.

The Warren Commission was following the orders of their President and ultimately they had the best interests of the country in mind.

It's just too bad they didn't do a better job and come up with a more plausible conclusion.

Regards,

Bill

http://home.wi.rr.com/harveyandlee/

Oswald could NEVER have defected and waltzed back into this country with no questions asked the way he did. It just could not happen, it was the height of the COLD WAR people!

In the 1980s when Reagan was President, a doctor from Houston defected to Russia. Within hours of it hitting the news, FBI was crawling all over his neighborhood, questioning neighbors, friends,relatives, etc. It was all over the news. That was the 80s. Imagine had it been the 60's with Russian missiles pointed at us.

I just don't get how people do not see this. Oswald was created and manipulated by the CIA from start to finish. He was a composite character. Look at the photos on the site. The CIA says these are all the same man??!!

His bio was printed in newspapers in New Zealand as the assassin several hours before the assassination even happened!!

Why do you think there were so many Oswald "sightings" all over Dallas in the days and weeks prior to the assassination?? Can you spell

s-e-t-u-p?? Why did they dig him up in 1979? Why all the controversy surrounding who was in that grave? It was Marina who wanted to know the truth, she was the only one who could have approved the exhumation.

But the truth eluded her still. The crypt had already been broken into according to the funeral home director who supervised the exhumation. Why did someone break into Oswald's grave???

He also stated that the head that was examined did not have the scar that was there after the autopsy when they buried Oswald.

Why did the FBI come to the funeral home in the dead of night and fingerprint Oswald on Nov. 24??? The funeral home director had to clean the ink off before the funeral and burial.

There could have been only one reason. They had nothing on the guy---not even prints on the rifle.

Why did Ruby state that others forced him to kill Oswald, asking to be taken to Washington so he could tell the truth about what had happened? He basically told the world that we did not have the true story.

The totality of all of this just blows away the lone assassin theory altogether. Not to mention the photograph of the shooter behind the fence wearing a policeman's uniform, dozens and dozens of witnesses seeing and hearing the shooter behind the fence, and actual film of the 6th floor moments before the assasination showing movement in 3 windows of the 6th floor.

I don't know what more people need to see this whole thing for what it was.

I've been reading The Best Evidence and I wanted to make an comment, I read that it was noted about the head snap. The motion of the head tilts forward and then the head shot shoves it back. That tends to support James Files Sutton claims of what happened when he shot him with the Fireball XP-100.2 shooters I also want to share a moment about Lee Harvey Oswald, On 9-11-01 I was escorting a paint crew as a member of Arkansas Highway Police. I was part of a crew that included a Crash Dump Truck. The driver and I was talking about events of the day and for some reason Lee Oswald was mentioned. I said I thought he was a low grade cia agent. The driver looked at me and said" There wasn't anything low grade about him. He was in basic training with Oswald and he said Lee came and went as he choose day or night. He said he asked Lee about where he was going to at night. He remarked Oswald told him that he really didn't want to know. He said Oswald was a good marksman and every thing about oswald being a nothing was just an act.

I find it interesting thast JFK's neck and chest X-rays have not been released!

**************************************

Also, as far as the Walker assassination attempt goes....I don't think Lee did it. I think he just told Marina that he did as a test to see who she would tell. (Sort of testing her loyalty.) Somehow, Gerge De Mohrenschildt knew about the Walker situation and Lee, (in front of Marina), was surprised to find out (George) would talk about it. Did Marina tell him (George), or was DeMohrenshildt actively investigating Lee...OR did DeMohrenschildt come up with the scheme in the first place to test Marina (with Lee's co-operation)?

I agreee, if LHO actually shot at Walker, that wouldn't make him look good--but that is just one interpretation of the situation.

*************************************

Also, apparently, an unidentified fingerprint found at the Sniper's nest was finally identified. It belonged to Malcolm Wallace, an associate of Billie Sol Estes, and LBJ!!! Billie Sol Estes has accused Malcolm Wallace, Jack Ruby and LHO as playing a role in the assassination of JFK.

SEE: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Billie_Sol_Estes

Oswald did it alone, plain and simple. He tried once before with Gen. Walker in April. He was a sharpshooter in the U.S.M.C. He had the means and desire. These conspiracies all fall apart.

There is no end to the mysteries surrounding this assassination. Nothing surprises me anymore. Even the ancient philosopher Nostradamus supposedly foretold of the event and also the fact an innocent man would be killed and accused of the crime.

Was it history, mystery, or prophecy?

Thought some of you might find this interesting. In google earth..3 giant Runways make up the letter K at CIA controlled Area 51. DRAW A LINE thru bottom leg of letter K and it lines up perfectly with the painted X on the road where JFK was killed... 1,117 miles apart! you can draw your own line in the program. Runway is 2 miles long the line runs right down the middle all the way to Dallas

Don't know if it means anything but I found it very interesting

According to the Dept of Justice, the President does indeed have the power to have access to all classified information.

But you have to consider two things. One, if you have a corrupt leader you automatically have corrupted information. Your entire security system is automatically compromised.

Remember when President Kennedy's brain disappeared from the National Archives never to be seen again?

The second thing is you have to understand is that the President of the United States is a figurehead and if you think by the mere fact that they are President makes them the most powerful person in Washington, you are very much mistaken.

This last administration is proof positive of that. It was a shadow government on steroids.

The ones who really run things will never allow the truth to come out about anything in which these powerful invisible entities played a part. They pull the strings. The people you see in the White House and cabinet are mere players.

Just to add a third footnote from a famous source......"follow the money".

This country is fast going to hell in a handbasket. We have been warned about this for years. Trillions of dollars completely unaccounted for. Whether it is in private industry or the military, there is no longer any accountability, and now we are handsomely rewarding the criminals with more of our hard earned tax dollars to steal, squander, loot and pillar other nations, declare illegal wars, steal worker's pensions, destroy the environment, traffic in human bondage, and never ever face a penalty.

Dick Cheney and Alberto Gonzalez were just indicted by a federal grand jury for crimes in Texas involving abuse of prisoners in a federal facility.

The story was buried in the back section of the paper. It should have been headlines. The media--also owned and operated by the shadow government.

There is a question I have asked many people about this and never gotten an answer. Does every President of the U.S. have access to information concealed by the Warren Commission? Does the Kennedy family (i.e. Bobby was still alive at that time, or Teddy) have access to this concealed information?

Of course Joe is right, however, the Z film has taken on a life of it's own. There are many questions now about the film itself, it's maker, and what was or was not done to it after the fact. Many had motive to mess with it to alter evidence and history.

I defer to the doctors at Parkland Hospital, their stories have never wavered. Nearly a dozen of them through the years have stated that the wound in the back of the President's head was a wound of exit and the throat wound was a wound of entrance. They were the first ones to see the President after he was shot. No one had time to intervene, alter anything, or indimidate these men into saying something they did not see or believe, all that happened later.

Ladies and Gentlemen, lets put aside what people say, and look at hard facts. For those who believe Lee harvey Oswald was the alone assassian, you obiviously have never taken Physics, so listen carefully. If you never seen the Zapruder film then that explains why you think he was the lone assassian. I want you to watch the Zapruder film on youtube and watch where JFK's head goes, then tell me if you think he was the lone assassian. Form this film you can infer that the shot came form the front and not the back, where Oswald was...Regards

I was just looking at the articals and photos of the neck wounds, and they say the wound was entered at the front, and exited through the back. If that is true, then the neck shot would have to be made from a shooter either on top of the bridge, or from inside the vehicle. Why doesn't it talk about that, instead of all the rest of things

I just realized that the link I gave in my earlier post actually attempts to refute the claim.

This link gives the actual opening statement made by New Orleans District Attorney Jim Garrison in the trial of Clay Shaw. The Clinton evidence is near the bottom.

www.prouty.org/opening.html

It was actually Clinton, Louisiana. Here is a good link with more info:

www.jfk-online.com/jfk100clinton.html

There were a number of very credible witnesses who all saw Shaw, Ferrie, and Oswald together that day.

Clay Shaw was a proven liar, the CIA director later said under oath that Shaw had in fact worked for the CIA, Shaw denied it repeatedly. Even the judge in the trial later spoke on camera in an interview and said it was obvious that Shaw was putting a great con job on the jury. Of couse, it makes you wonder about the ethics of that judge, he threw out much evidence and a number of witnesses that could have made a stronger case against Shaw, like the proof that Shaw had told a New Orleans police office after his arrest that he also went by the alias Clay Bertrand. The judge would not allow that into evidence. Makes you wonder whose side he was on. I am sure that the FBI also did a con job on that judge and reminded him as they did so many that they could make his life uncomfortable if the case did not have a certain outcome.

What about the Clinton, Alabama link with Shaw and Oswald

Even McAdams work supports it

LHO pleading his innocence always reminds me of the infamous Sherlock Holmes conclusion in so many cases........................

"The Dog Didn't Bark".........

He wanted to become famous by denying he killed someone famous?

I WILL PROBABALY NEVER STOP READING TEXT ABOUT THE JFK MURDER. EVERYTIME I FINISH A BOOK TEN MORE ARE PUBLISHED. THRU ALL OF THE VOLUMES I HAVE NEVERRRRR... SEEN AN EXPLANTION OF THE TWO MOST CRITICAL ASPECTS OF THIS CASE. RIDDLE ME THIS: FIRST WHY DID LHO DEPOSIT FOUR .38 SHELL CASINGS AT 10TH AND PATTON HAVING JUST SHOT TIPPET FROM A GUN CAPABLE OF HOLDING SIX SHELLS? UNLOADING THE GUN AT THIIS MOMENT ONLY PUT A SIGNATURE ON A FOUL PLAY.

SECONDLY: I SCREAM AT THE VIDEO WHEN I VIEW THE QUESTIONS ASK OF OSWALD AT POLICE 11.22.63 LATE NIGHT: "DID YOU SHOOT THE PRESIDENT?" LHO ANSWER " NO I HAVE NOT BEEN CHARGED WITH THAT ..... IN FACT I JUST LEARNED OF THAT... ETC. " DEAR GOD PEOPLE WOULDN'T A

" LONE NUT " DEFECTOR, WANTING TO BE

NOTED FOR SOMETHING IMPORTANT AND SIGNIFICANT IN HIS PATHETIC LIFE SCREAM OUT YES I SHOT THE PRESIDENT, I LEE HARVEY OSWALD AM THE MAN... THEY GOT ME . I DID IT. I KILLED THE PRESIDENT AND NINTY SECOND LATER STOOD IN THE LUNCHROOM ON THE 2ND FLOOR OF THE TSBD BUILDING DRINKING A DR. PEPPER. ANSWER ME THAT GERALD POSNER. WHAT A SHIP OF FOOL WE ARE . THANKS !

Thank you for crating this website and for all of the feedback... this has helped me with my report of the JFK assassination: I had to create my own theory.

I do believe there were shots fired from the book depository but they were purely diversional. They were part of the cover story. They had to be. Robert Groden has a DVD called Assassination Films. These are all home movies made by Dallas residents there that day in Dealey Plaza.

No way the CIA or Secret Service could have confiscated all of the films made that day. There is one showing the 6th floor just seconds before the motorcade passes the SBD. There is movement in all three windows at the same time from the "sniper's nest" on down. Proof positive there was more than one person on the floor at the time of the shooting. They took the film and did a blowup of one of the windows and it shows a man crouched down, you can see his head, t-shirt, hairline, everything. Oh, and it looks nothing like Lee Harvey Oswald.