The John F. Kennedy Assassination Homepage

Navigation

  » Introduction
  » The Report
  » The Hearings

Volumes

  » Testimony Index
 
  » Volume I
  » Volume II
  » Volume III
  » Volume IV
  » Volume V
  » Volume VI
  » Volume VII
  » Volume VIII
  » Volume IX
  » Volume X
  » Volume XI
  » Volume XII
  » Volume XIII
  » Volume XIV
  » Volume XV
Warren Commission Hearings: Vol. I - Page 44« Previous | Next »

(Testimony of Mrs. Lee Harvey Oswald Resumed)

Mrs. Oswald.
Lee told me that he had sent an application, but it was he who put this letter in an envelope and addressed it, so I don't know whether it was there or not.
Mr. Rankin.
And when you say that it was he that put the letter into the envelope and addressed it, you mean this Exhibit 12, that was a letter that you had written?
Mrs. Oswald.
Yes
Mr. Rankin.
Do I understand you correctly that you do not know whether his application was included because he handled the mailing of it?
Mrs. Oswald.
Yes.
Mr. Rankin.
I will hand you Exhibit 13 and ask you if you recall that?
Mrs. Oswald.
I don't remember this. He did not write this in my presence. But it is Lee's handwriting.
Mr. Rankin.
Mr. Krimer, will you please translate it for her so she will know the contents.
Mrs. Oswald.
Why "separately"--the word "separately" here is underlined.
Mr. Rankin.
I was going to ask you. But since you have not seen it before, I guess you cannot help us.
Is this the first time that you knew that he had ever asked that his visa be handled separately from yours?
Mrs. Oswald.
Yes, I didn't know this. Because I hadn't seen this letter.
Mr. Rankin.
I offer in evidence Exhibit 13.
The Chairman.
It may be admitted.
(The document referred to was marked Commission Exhibit No. 13, and received in evidence.)
Mr. Rankin.
Is the word "separately" the last word of the letter that you are referring to--that is the word that you asked about?
Mrs. Oswald.
Yes. Was that underlined by Lee?
Mr. Rankin.
That is the way we received it, Mrs. Oswald. We assume it was underlined by your husband. We know that it was not underlined by the Commission, and no one in the Government that had anything to do with it has ever told us that they had anything to do with underlining it.
Mrs. Oswald.
I think that perhaps he asked for that visa to be considered separately because the birth of the child might complicate matters, and perhaps he thought it would speed it up if they do consider it separately.
Mr. Rankin.
In connection with that thought, I will hand you Exhibit 14, and ask you to examine that and tell us whether you have seen that before.
Mrs. Oswald.
Yes.
Mr. Rankin.
Will you please compare the translation in English?
Mrs. Oswald.
Yes, the translation is all right.
Mr. Rankin.
I offer in evidence the letter in Russian, Exhibit 14, and the English translation.
The Chairman.
It may be admitted under that number.
(The documents referred to were marked Commission Exhibit No. 14, and received in evidence.)
Mr. Rankin.
Did you have any impression that your husband may not have planned to go back to Russia himself, but was merely trying to arrange for you and your daughter to go back?
Mrs. Oswald.
At that time I did not think so, but now I think perhaps. Because he planned to go to Cuba.
Mr. Rankin.
By that you mean you think he may have planned to go to Cuba and never go beyond Cuba, but stay in Cuba?
Mrs. Oswald.
I think that in time he would have wanted to come and see me.
Mr. Rankin.
I hand you Exhibit 15 and ask you whether you remember having seen that before.
Mrs. Oswald.
No.
Mr. Rankin.
Can you tell whether your husband's handwriting is on that exhibit?
Mrs. Oswald.
The signature is his, yes. I would like to have it translated.
Mr. Rankin.
Would you translate it for her, please, Mr. Krimer?
Mrs. Oswald.
A crazy letter. Perhaps from this I could conclude that he did want to go to the Soviet Union--but now I am lost, I don't know. Because----
« Previous | Next »

Found a Typo?

Click here
Copyright by www.jfk-assassination.comLast Update: Wed, 3 Aug 2016 21:56:33 CET