Mrs. Oswald.

Yes, that is right. That is right. This is correct. That is right. That is right. That is right. That is right. That is right. That is right. That is right. That is right. That is right.
Those are all right, sir.

Mr. Rankin.

You have Just finished comparing Exhibits 228 through 236 both inclusive, and found them to be correct photostatic copies of your files concerning the Albert Schweitzer matter?

Mrs. Oswald.

That is right.

Mr. Rankin.

We offer in evidence, Exhibits 228 through 236 both inclusive.

The Chairman.

They may be admitted.
(The photostatic copies referred to were received in evidence as Commission Exhibit Nos. 228 through 236, inclusive.)

The Chairman.

Have you introduced all the records you have now?

Mr. Rankin.

Just a few more, Mr. Chairman.
(The document referred to was marked 241 for identification.)

Mr. Rankin.

Mrs. Oswald, I hand you Exhibit 241 and ask you if that is one of the letters that you referred to in your testimony?

Mrs. Oswald.

That is right.

Mr. Rankin.

And it is one that you received?

Mrs. Oswald.

It is one that I received in a letter from Russia, from Lee. And you have the letter, telling me to go to the International Rescue Committee, and to show the papers to the Red Cross in Vernon. This is the letter inclosed in that letter.

Mr. Rankin.

We offer in evidence Exhibit 241, and ask leave to substitute a copy.

The Chairman.

It may be admitted.
(The letter referred to was received in evidence as Commission Exhibit No. 241.)
(Documents marked 242 and 243 for identification.)

Mr. Rankin.

Exhibits 242 and 243 are the telegram and the letter you received back from your transmission to the White House that you have testified about this morning, is that right?

Mrs. Oswald.

That is right.

Mr. Rankin.

And you say you would like to have the originals back?

Mrs. Oswald.

Yes, sir.

Mr. Rankin.

We offer in evidence Exhibits 242 and 243 and ask leave to substitute copies.

The Chairman.

It may be admitted on that condition.
(Commission Exhibits Nos. 242 and 243 were admitted in evidence.)

The Chairman.

Are all the records identified now and admitted, Mr. Rankin?

Mr. Rankin.

Mr. Chairman. we have one further matter. and that is some correspondence that involves her son's communications with the Embassy, which correspondence was examined in the presence of Mr. Mark Lane when we were taking photostatic copies. And during that examination. Mrs. Oswald was able to identify the handwriting on part of them, and not able to identify it on another part. Is that right, Mrs. Oswald?

Mrs. Oswald.

That is right; yes, sir.

Mr. Rankin.

And we think we should probably, to cover that matter, ask her briefly to point those out.

The Chairman.

Very well. Let's get that done before we adjourn, and then we will adjourn for lunch.

Mr. Rankin.

Mr. Reporter, I will ask you to mark these exhibits, which are the ones that I understand Mrs. Oswald was able to identify the handwriting on.
(Documents were marked Commission Exhibits Nos. 244 through 250 for identification.)

Mr. Rankin.

Mrs. Oswald, will you examine Exhibits 244 through 250, both inclusive, and tell us whether or not those are photostatic copies of communications of your son that you recognize the handwriting on of the originals?

Mrs. Oswald.

Yes, sir.